“In Sickert v. Sickert (1899) P. 278, it was held that in order to constitute desertion, there must be a cessation of cohabitation and an intention on the part of the accused party to desert the other. It seems to me that the question to which the learned judge should have addressed his mind was whether or not the wife respondent was in desertion in 1939 when she left her matrimonial home. In spite of all the learned judge had to say about the savagery of the war and the matter of animus on the part of the respondent, it is clear from the facts that the war was not enough course for the respondent to abandon her matrimonial home, and that she had not the intention to return to her husband.”