“…Woolmington’s case is concerned with explaining and reinforcing the rule that the prosecution must prove the charge it makes beyond reasonable doubt, and, consequently, that if, on the material before the jury, there is a reasonable doubt, the prisoner should have the benefit of it…”

Per GEORGE BAPTIST AYODOLA COKER, JSC in OKOKO V. THE STATE (1964) LCER-331(SC) (Pp 7 – 7 Paras D – E) #