Access Denied: Please Log In or Register Now
Thank you for your interest in LawCompass™. Unfortunately, you are currently logged out. To access our exclusive repository of premium legal insights, please Log In to your account.
If you’re not yet a premium member, consider Registering Now for unlimited access to our extensive collection of Cases, Laws, Rules/Forms, and more.
Log In or Register today to enhance your legal expertise.
Best regards, LawCompass™.
See Also:
- APPEAL – Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact – Attitude of the Supreme Court Towards Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact by Lower Courts
"Unless the concurrent findings of the Court of Appeal and the High Court on crucial issues are shown to be perverse in any respect, the Supreme Court will not interfere.…
- APPEAL - Interference with Concurrent Finding(s) of Fact(s) - Attitude of the appellate Court to concurrent findings of fact(s) by Lower Courts
"The attitude of this Court towards appeals against concurrent findings of two Courts below is very well known. This Court will not disturb such findings unless there is some miscarriage…
- APPEAL: Concurrent Findings of Fact - The Supreme Court's Attitude Towards Concurrent Findings of Fact by Lower Courts
"What this Court is called upon to do at this stage is to upturn the concurrent findings of the two Courts above the Chief Magistrate Court. What makes it an…
- APPEAL - INTERFERENCE WITH CONCURRENT FINDING(S) OF FACT(S) - Instances where the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of fact(s) by Lower Courts
"My lords, this appeal being against concurrent findings of fact(s), we need to remind ourselves that the Court, especially where the findings turn on the credibility of witnesses, hardly intervenes.…
- APPEAL - INTERFERENCE WITH CONCURRENT FINDING(S) OF FACT(S) - Instances where the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of fact(s) by Lower Courts
"...The law is settled that the apex Court, on concurrent findings of fact, will not lightly intervene and interfere or disturb such concurrent findings of fact: OMETA v. NUMA (1934)…