Access Denied: Please Log In or Register Now
Thank you for your interest in LawCompass™. Unfortunately, you are currently logged out. To access our exclusive repository of premium legal insights, please Log In to your account.
If you’re not yet a premium member, consider Registering Now for unlimited access to our extensive collection of Cases, Laws, Rules/Forms, and more.
Log In or Register today to enhance your legal expertise.
Best regards, LawCompass™.
See Also:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Concurrent findings of fact(s) – Attitude of Supreme Court to concurrent findings of facts by the lower courts – Grounds or reasons for interference with concurrent findings
“It is a long settled law that the only way to disturb those concurrent findings is to show that they came from a perverse posturing and from what can be…
- APPEAL: Concurrent Findings – Reluctance of the Supreme Court to interfere with concurrent findings – Circumstances in which the Supreme Court may interfere with – Duty of the Appellant to prove the perverseness of the findings
“The law is quite well settled that an appellate court does not generally interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless such findings are shown to be perverse. A decision or…
- APPEAL – Concurrent Findings – Whether and when an appellate Court may interfere with the concurrent findings of the lower courts
"The Supreme Court has indeed in a Plethora of cases stated what should first be available for the appellate Court or even the Apex Court to disturb concurrent findings. Any…