“… Section 18(3) of the Interpretation Act 1964 is governed by Section 1 of that Act which reads: “1. This Act shall apply to the provisions of any enactment except in so far as the contrary intention appears in this Act or the enactment in question.” The effect of Section 18(3) of the Interpretation Act, 1964 is that there is a presumption that the use of the word “or” means that the following words are not to be construed as similar to the proceeding words, so that the onus is on the person seeking to say that they are similar to show that the contrary intention, as provided for in Section 1 of the Interpretation Act 1964, applies.”
Per LEWIS, JSC in NASR V. BOUARI (1969) LCER-488(SC) (P. 9; Paras C – D)
See Also:
- STATUTE – Interpretation of Statutes - Proper Interpretation of Section 116 (1) of the Criminal Code
"On a careful examination of this section, we agree that a peace officer who asks for or receives money or any property corruptly for any other person on account of…
- INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - The three Rules of interpretation of statutes
CHIEF OBAFEMI AWOLOWO V. ALHAJI SHEHU SHAGARI (1979-LCER-2025-SC) The three rules of statutory interpretation, which dominate the historical perspective are: (1) The mischief Rule; (2) The literal Rule; and (3)…
- ELECTORAL MATTERS: The Electoral Act, 2010 - Extent of the Provisions of the Electoral Act 2010
“The Electoral Act, 2010 (as amended), which is an Act of the National Assembly makes elaborate provisions not only for the manner in which elections shall be conducted by INEC…