Access Denied: Please Log In or Register Now
Thank you for your interest in LawCompass™. Unfortunately, you are currently logged out. To access our exclusive repository of premium legal insights, please Log In to your account.
If you’re not yet a premium member, consider Registering Now for unlimited access to our extensive collection of Cases, Laws, Rules/Forms, and more.
Log In or Register today to enhance your legal expertise.
Best regards, LawCompass™.
See Also:
- APPEAL: Concurrent findings – Attitude of the Supreme Court to concurrent findings of facts by the lower courts – When the Supreme Court may interfere with concurrent findings of facts
“The trial court and the court below made concurrent findings of facts on which the Appellant's conviction and sentence as well as the affirmation thereof were predicated. It is settled…
- APPEAL: Concurrent Findings – Reluctance of the Supreme Court to interfere with concurrent findings – Circumstances in which the Supreme Court may interfere with – Duty of the Appellant to prove the perverseness of the findings
“The law is quite well settled that an appellate court does not generally interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless such findings are shown to be perverse. A decision or…
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Concurrent findings of fact(s) – Attitude of the Supreme Court to concurrent findings – Rights of the Supreme Court to interfere with perverse findings
“What is more, there are concurrent findings of fact and law by both lower courts, to the effect that from the facts presented before them, the appellant was not entitled…