Access Denied: Please Log In or Register Now
Thank you for your interest in LawCompass™. Unfortunately, you are currently logged out. To access our exclusive repository of premium legal insights, please Log In to your account.
If you’re not yet a premium member, consider Registering Now for unlimited access to our extensive collection of Cases, Laws, Rules/Forms, and more.
Log In or Register today to enhance your legal expertise.
Best regards, LawCompass™.
See Also:
- APPEAL – Interference with Concurrent Finding(s) of Fact(s) – Attitude of the Supreme Court Towards Interference with Concurrent Finding(s) of Fact(s) of Lower Courts
"...The Appellant has not demonstrated that the concurrent findings by the two (2) lower Courts on his conviction for the offence were either perverse, based on misapprehension and misapplication of…
- APPEAL - INTERFERENCE WITH CONCURRENT FINDING(S) OF FACT(S) - Attitude of the Supreme Court to interference with concurrent finding(s) of fact(s) of Lower Courts
"Finally, this appeal is against the concurrent findings of the trial Court and the Court of Appeal and the attitude of this Court is that it will not interfere with…
- APPEAL - INTERFERENCE WITH CONCURRENT FINDING(S) OF FACT(S) - Attitude of the Supreme Court to interference with concurrent finding(s) of fact(s) of Lower Courts
"I wish to state categorically that this Court would rarely interfere with concurrent findings of the two lower Courts except where such is found to be perverse or unsupported from…
- APPEAL - INTERFERENCE WITH CONCURRENT FINDING(S) OF FACT(S) - Attitude of the Supreme Court to interference with concurrent finding(s) of fact(s) of Lower Courts
"Indeed, the law is well settled beyond peradventure, that the Supreme Court does not dispose itself to interfering with concurrent findings of the two Courts below unless such findings are…
- APPEAL - Interference with Concurrent Finding(s) of Fact(s) - Attitude of the Supreme Court towards interference with concurrent finding(s) of fact(s) by Lower Courts
"This Court, from a long line of its decisions, is usually hesitant in disturbing concurrent findings by a trial Court and the Court of Appeal, unless an appellant convincingly demonstrates…